• NPA home page • NPA Trade Directory
• Helen's Nuffield Blog
wednesday june 16, 2010
Phlegm fatale
DS's quit-smoking blog.
Europe votes for honest labelling
Country of origin labelling is already compulsory for some foods, such as beef, honey, olive oil and fresh fruit and vegetables.
And today MEPs supported extending this to all meat, poultry, dairy products and other single-ingredient products.
They also voted for the country of origin to be stated for meat, poultry and fish when used as an ingredient in processed food. However, this may be subject to an impact assessment.
Meat labels should indicate where the animal was born, reared and slaughtered, says Parliament. In addition, meat from slaughter without stunning (according to certain religious traditions) should be labelled as such.
The final vote in Parliament today was 559 in favour, 54 against and 32 abstentions. However, no quick agreement is expected with the European Council, so the draft legislation is likely to return to Parliament for a second reading.
Once the legislation is adopted, food business will have three years to adapt to the rules. Smaller operators would have five years to comply
Food labels should also feature mandatory nutritional information and guideline daily amounts, according to draft EU legislation as adopted by MEPs today.
However, they rejected a proposal for 'traffic light' values to highlight the salt, sugar and fat content of processed foods.
"Overall I am satisfied with the result of today's important vote on clearer food information rules. Personally, I am pleased that MEPs did not support traffic light labelling, but I also feel that we can continue to improve the current proposal to, who drafted Parliament's report.
MEPs backed the European Commission proposal that quantities of fat, saturates, sugar and salt - as well as energy - must be indicated on the front of food packs.
These should be accompanied by guideline daily amounts and expressed with per 100g or per 100ml values. They also voted for details of protein, fibres and transfats to be included elsewhere on the packaging. To ensure the labels are legible, MEPs want a wide range of factors to be taken into account.
MEPs want food that is not prepacked, such as meat from a butcher, to be exempt from nutrition labelling rules. Microenterprises making handcrafted food products should also be excluded, they say.
Why we are proud of our industry
 English pig-keepers are proud of the high welfare of their pigs. It's what they most want to tell consumers about, according to a survey.
And a majority would be willing to carry out welfare self-assessments as part of farm assurance, and to be anonymously benchmarked on the welfare of their pigs.
These findings have been published in the Veterinary Record as the pilot phase of BPEX's Real Welfare project gets under way.
Real Welfare involves scoring pigs for five welfare indicators — lameness, tail lesions, hospitalisation, body lesions and enrichment use.
In due course Real Welfare scoring by vets will become part of farm assurance.
"It will be an objective means of demonstrating we are good welfarists, instead of being judged on type or size of unit, or the perception that one production system is always better than another," says producer and BPEX board member Meryl Ward.
According to a survey by researchers at Bristol and Newcastle universities, 66 percent of pig farmers would be quite or very willing to be anonymously benchmarked on the welfare of their pigs.
The survey was carried out by means of a questionnaire at six BPEX health seminars in October 2006 and was completed by 56 pig-keepers.
- Farmers were most commonly proud of the productivity (27.5 per cent) and welfare (23.5 percent) of the pigs on their farm, and the welfare of pigs in the United Kingdom industry as a whole (26.1 percent).
- The most common thing they wanted to tell consumers about was the welfare of the pigs (55.8 percent), followed by their stockmanship qualities, the quality of their pigmeat and the safety of their pigmeat (all 13.5 percent).
Over 90 percent of pigmeat produced in the United Kingdom comes from assured farms.
But there has, in the past, been criticism from the Farm Animal Welfare Council and from Compassion in World Farming that existing farm assurance schemes do not provide a significant level of welfare assurance, note the Bristol and Newcastle researchers.
Both the Farm Animal Welfare Council and Compassion in World Farming have called for the inclusion of 'welfare outcome' measures to be included in farm assurance.
Pig-keepers were surveyed for their views, as they pay for farm assurance and their continuing support of the assurance schemes is essential. The survey was funded by BPEX. More in July Pig World.
Brazil — the country to watch
Above: Outlook for world livestock prices.
The importance of Brazil as a meat exporter is highlighted in Agricultural Outlook 2010-2019, a new report by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations.
It sees the bulk of growth in meat traded coming particularly from Brazil which will single-handedly account for nearly 60 percent of all meat exported from non-OECD countries in 2019.
(The principle OECD countries are the United States and Canada, Japan and most of Europe.)
World meat consumption will continue to experience one of the highest rates of growth among the major agricultural commodities, says the report.
Much of the increase in demand will come from large non-OECD countries with their growing wealth and affluence, where poultrymeat consumption is projected to grow 38 percent and pigmeat by 33 percent.
Measured on a per person basis, meat consumption in the OECD area will rises by only four percent in the same period.
Farewell Andrew Stockings
— standing room only
By Peter Crichton
Dorchester Abbey was filled to capacity on Tuesday at the funeral of Andrew Stockings (1951–2010), following his long and brave battle with cancer.
Over 600 people, including many leading pig industry figures as well as a whole host of family, friends and colleagues, paid their last respects to Andrew yesterday.
"One of life's characters" was certainly an understatement and was repeated many times during the service and afterwards, which included moving and at times amusing addresses from David Orpwood and the Reverend Canon Flora Winfield, as well as Hugh Crabtree singing a poignant "Song from a Friend" to a packed house and a lesson read by Andrew's brother-in-law Brian Bugg.
Although Andrew often had a gruff exterior, the message that came over time and again is what a warm, generous and kind person he was underneath it all and a devoted husband to Sally, father to John, Charlie, David and Tom, and friend to so many others.
The whole Thames Valley Pigs set up would not be the force it is without Andrew's drive, enthusiasm and marketing skills, which have seen this farmers' cooperative prosper through what have often been very difficult and challenging times. Andrew could be described as having "balls of steel" in trading situations.
A fitting tribute to a pig industry legend.
Danish pig vets warned off antibiotics
The Danish food and agriculture ministry will soon be issuing new guidelines for acceptable levels of antibiotic use on Denmark's pig units.
Health experts are concerned that over use of antibiotics will lead to increased resistance in pigs, as well as in humans who eat pork containing antibiotic residues.
The agriculture ministry will introduce a yellow card warning system for vets and farmers who are giving too many antibiotics to pigs.
Farmers and vets given the warning will have nine months to take corrective measures.
If the measures taken are inadequate, the violators will be fined, investigators will conduct a thorough control check at the pig units involved, and the government's own correctional plan will be put in place for the violators to follow.
Henrik Høegh, food and agriculture minister, has a list of vets who prescribed the most antibiotics per pig from June 2008 to June 2009.
The names at the top of the list had already been summoned by the Veterinary and Food Administration back in 2005 for prescribing excessive amounts of antibiotics, which totalled 33 percent of all those prescribed nationwide.
However, the goal of the agency's contact at the time was to reduce the use of one specific type of antibiotic as opposed to cutting down on the total amount.
Working time rules must apply to self-employed, confirm MEPs
Self-employed bus and lorry drivers must be brought under the same rules on working hours as drivers who work for companies, decided the European Parliament today.
A majority of MEPs voted to reject a European Commission proposal that self-employed drivers continue to be exempted from the 2002 Working Time Directive.
There were 368 votes in favour, 301 against and 8 abstentions.
Self-employed drivers were temporarily exempted from the rules of the existing European Union directive on drivers' working hours but were due to come under those rules by 23 March 2009 unless the European Commission proposed legislation to the contrary.
The Commission did that in October 2008, seeking to exempt them permanently. Parliament has now rejected the Commission's proposal.
Current European Union law on employed drivers lays down an average limit of 48 hours a week, which can rise to 60 hours a week provided it does not exceed the average of 48 hours a week over a four-month period.
tuesday june 15, 2010
New surface treatment
Polypropylene is an ideal material for wall-lining in pig houses, being hard-wearing and easy to clean. But it had one weakness... until now.
"One of the benefits of polypropylene is that nothing sticks to it," said Roger Smith of ARM Buildings. "Unfortunately this also made it impossible to stick it to our wall panels."
But now ARM has introduced a new electronic treatment machine that increases the surface energy of the polypropylene and guarantees the bond.
"By using this material we are now capable of producing a panel with the strength and durability of stainless steel but at a fraction of the cost," said Roger Smith.
"This is undoubtedly the most significant improvement in our manufacturing process since the introduction of the vacuum laminating process."
Vote for honesty, urges NPA
By Digby Scott
MEPS vote on mandatory place-of-farming labelling tomorrow. The outcome is critical for the future prosperity of British farming, and British pig-keeping in particular.
NPA's Barney Kay today stressed the importance of all United Kingdom MEPs supporting the introduction of mandatory place-of-farming labelling at the earliest opportunity.
He is concerned the European People's Party, European Conservatives and Reformists (which includes United Kingdom Conservatives) and the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe may vote for more information about the impact of such a measure.
If they do, it will give vociferous lobbyists for processors and retailers more time to persuade the European Parliament and the European Commission that place-of-farming labelling is a bad idea.
And there is a risk that honest labelling won't be introduced for several more years, during which time British pigs will have slipped out of profit.
The current differential between the British and continental price is 20p a kilo. The British differential relies on honest labelling.
Therefore mandatory origin labelling remains the single most important issue for the British pig industry, just as it has been for the past decade.
John Thompson (Ulster Farmers Union president) and Meurig Raymond (NFU deputy president) have been in Strasbourg this week to urge MEPs to vote in favour of mandatory country of origin labelling on food.
New export market for pigmeat
Pig producers have a new market. The Philippines has re-opened its market to the United Kingdom. The market had been closed since the outbreak of foot-and-mouth in 2007 and never formally re-opened.
Work by BPEX and Defra helped fast-track the approval from the country's veterinary authorities.
BPEX international manager Peter Hardwick said, "This has all happened in the last four weeks and already two or three consignments have been exported.
"The Philippines is a very important market for the fifth quarter and offals and we have hopes the trade will grow rapidly.
"Fifth quarter is particularly important as it has a low value here - in some cases even a disposal cost - while it can command good prices in some overseas markets."
monday june 14,2010
How to do a carbon
audit on your pig unit
By Digby Scott
What do you think the biggest carbon polluter is on the average arable farm? No, not the grain drier, which is what I thought.
It's the bagged nitrogen fertiliser. So if pig producers are going to have to pay a carbon tax of about £16 a tonne in future (see "Carbon tax on farming" below) they at least have the advantage of producing much of their own NPK for crops.
The tax won't be introduced this year but it is on the way, so now might be a good time for all pig producers to carry out a carbon audit and see where changes can be made.
Some may already have done this, to satisfy the requirements of their supply chain.
The Coulters wanted to know the total greenhouse gas emissions from their farm so they could understand how big a problem they might have when a carbon tax on farming is introduced.
Having built the carbon calculator for their own use, they decided to make it available to other farmers, with the help of a small grant to get their website up and running. There are two calculators —one is free, the other requires a small payment.
The Farming and Wildlife Group says carbon footprint reports can be a useful business tool.
It quotes one farmer as saying, "Carrying out the carbon footprint really made us think about our costs, especially electricity and fuel. You don't really know where you are until you get a carbon footprint done. We are all aware of what we should be doing, but need to identify ways in which we can effectively reduce emissions and costs at the same time."
Another said, "Getting ready for the calculations was a useful exercise. It made me stop and remind myself to look at our costs and inputs. The visit prompted me to check the timer and think about what lights were being left on unnecessarily."
Defra, the Carbon Trust and the British Standards Institution are currently working on a standard carbon calculator for the agriculture industry.
Here is the
Carbon Trust carbon footprint calculator.
There are two kinds of carbon audit, explains the Scottish Agricultural College.
The whole farm approach is useful for farmers wanting to measure their carbon footprint for benchmarking purposes and as a basis to develop strategies for reducing emissions, whilst lifecycle analysis can be used to measure emissions from a product.
"In both instances the calcuations use internationally agreed guidelines and emissions factors although it is recognised that emissions such as methane from animals and nitrous oxide from fertlisers can be affected by a number of different factors."
(What I'd like you to do, but I doubt you will, is to carry out an audit and then forward the results to this website, so we could publish some kind of anonymous benchmark figures as a guide to others.)
Should Danish Crown become
a public limited company?
If Danish Crown wants to expand where is it going to get the money from? Should it become a public limited company?
This was the starting point for a discussion at a meeting of the Danish Crown board of representatives last week.
Given its declining supply of pigs, dramatically changing conditions in the financial markets and a desire, nevertheless, to create growth, it was decided the time is right to resume a debate that first started in Danish Crown in 2005.
Only this time, the intention is that the debate will result in a decision by the members, in the not too distant future.
It proved to be an emotional discussion which touched on deep-rooted historical values.
Alternatives suggested at the meeting included keeping the current cooperative structure, and bringing in external investors on board through a share scheme.
The current debate on ownership of Danish Crown will help determine its future strategy as a globally-oriented food company.
"It was a very exciting discussion at an interesting point in time, where we are seeing increasing optimism in primary production.
"Therefore I am also very keen to see how the debate on the form of ownership develops at this summer's meetings for members where it is on the agenda," said Erik Bredholt, deputy chairman of Danish Crown's board of directors.
Sea Eagle plan is grounded
As highlighted on this page last week ("Golden era beckons") the government's drive to cut wasteful public spending will bring benefits to pig producers.
For instance, Natural England has announced today that it is withdrawing funding for a project that would have seen Sea Eagles introduced to East Anglia, where they would have spooked sows and preyed on young pigs.
"This is a victory for commonsense and for good sound lobbying," says CLA. But RSPB says it will try to find a way to fund the project itself, so the battle is not won yet.
Jimmy Butler is among those mentioned in CLA dispatches for help with the stop-the-sea-eagle campaign. Here he is on BBC news today.
sunday June 13, 2010
Iconic slogan has had its day
By Digby Scott
For over 20 years United States pig producers have pinned their marketing ambitions on their "The Other White Meat" slogan. But currently sales are stagnant, so perhaps it is time for a change.
"The Other White Meat" changed consumer perception of pork, highlighting its lean, healthy, versatile characteristics.  But the slogan has lost its impact in recent years.
The National Pork Board won't drop it completely as a marketing tool, but it will no longer be the focal point of advertising campaigns. A new branding campaign will be launched next March.
"I don't think anybody could have imagined it would become as iconic as it has become," said Mark Williams, who helped develop the slogan.
Above: "The Other White Meat" was widely imitated, not least by vegetarian groups.
Below: The success of "The Other White Meat" provoked a spate of retaliatory adverts.
Carbon tax on farming
A timetable for the introduction of a carbon tax on farmers will be considered by the European Commission later this month.
An internal working document suggests the minimum charge would be circa £16 per tonne of CO2 emitted.
New minimum levels of tax per energy content might also apply, with favourable levels for sustainable biofuels and higher rates for more polluting energy sources such as coal.
Taxing sectors such as farming is thought by Brussels to be a cost-effective way for member countries to reach their commitments under the European Union climate and energy package.
saturday June 12, 2010
GM inflexibility will
cause more hardship
There was concern last year when several loads of maize were rejected at the European Union border because they contained specks of a GM maize variety not, at the time, approved in the European Union.
Amid fears that exporters of maize and, crucially, soya would find less troublesome markets than Europe, there were demands by MEPs for a more flexible approach by the European Union and in response the European Commission promised a "technical solution".
But so far no solution has been forthcoming. This week MEPs called on the Commission to explain why it has delayed the publication of its technical solution for low level presence of non-authorised GM products in European Union imports.
A number of European Parliament agriculture committee MEPs are urging the Commission to "bring forward without further delay the Commission's proposal for a practical measure" to address the European Union's zero tolerance policy.
The MEPs fear that if this isn't done there will be "further cost, hardship and inefficiencies for Europe's hard-pressed food and animal feed sectors".
There will be a response from the European Commission within six weeks. Officials in the health and consumer department have previously indicated the dossier will probably not be dealt with until the end of the year.
Why pork labelling will
never
be the same again
By Digby Scott
Europe is moving towards a dramatic change in the meat labelling landscape, where genuine country of farming information must be given, fast food sellers will have to declare where their meat comes from, and illustrations will be banned if they might make shoppers think that Dutch bacon comes from the English shires.
Where processors claim it is impractical to put country of origin on the label, they will be be given the stark choice of using the unappealing statement "Of unspecified origin" instead.
Whilst the European Commission and some ministers are probably lukewarm about genuine transparency, most members of the European Parliament are clear, from public feedback, that genuine origin information must, for the first time, be included on all meat labels.
But for British pig-keepers it is all a matter of timing. Ideally they need to see new country of origin rules in place before sterling strengthens significantly against the euro or there is a downturn in the pig price cycle.
The next step towards an all-new labelling regulation will be on Tuesday and Wednesday next week when the European Parliament debates points of difference between itself and Brussels on labelling.
There are concerns that a majority of MEPs will favour an impact assessment on country of origin labelling. This could delay its introduction, leading to several more years of British consumers being misled. NPA has been in touch with agriculture minister Jim Paice about this.
This is such a big shake-up of labelling law that MEPs are determined to get it right. They are particularly concerned not to overburden shoppers with more information than they need.
German MEP Renate Sommer, the European Parliament's rapporteur on labelling, has been critical of the Brussels approach to labelling as lacking science and being over-complicated.
"The fact that the Commission drew up the proposal for a regulation without consulting outside experts is both remarkable and alarming. It is also mystifying that the proposal should have been submitted at a time when, although the results of piecemeal scientific research are available, a broad-based study covering all the member states has only just been started," she said.
The European Parliament environment committee is in favour of mandatory country of origin labelling and has in general demanded that more backbone into the proposed regulation.
At Strasbourg next week, MEPs will debate, and make amendments to the European Parliament's current position which is as follows.
- Country of origin or place of provenance must be given on all meat, poultry, dairy products and fresh fruit and veg labels.
- For meat and poultry, the country of origin or place of provenance may be given as a single place for animals only where the animals have been born, reared and slaughtered in the same country or place.
- In other cases, information on each of the different places of birth, rearing and slaughter must be given.
- Where it is impractical to label the country of origin, the following statement may be given instead, "Of unspecified origin".
The European Parliament environment committee says that where meat is concerned, it is not appropriate to indicate only one place of origin, if it is different for birth, rearing and slaughtering.
"Surveys have shown that information about the place where the animals were born, reared and slaughtered is of high importance for consumers."
- In all cases, the indication of country of origin or place of provenance should be provided in a manner which does not deceive the consumer and on the basis of clearly defined criteria which ensure a level playing field for the industry and improve consumers' understanding of the information related to the country of origin or place of provenance of a food. Such criteria should not apply to indications related to the name or address of the food business operator.
- Foods originating from third countries may only be distributed within the European Union once they fulfill the requirements of the new European Union regulation on labelling.
- A place where a food is processed cannot be regarded as a place of provenance.
- The description and/or pictorial representation of food must not mislead consumers with regard to its nature, identity, properties, composition, individual ingredients and their quantity in the product, durability, country of origin or place of provenance, method of manufacture or production.
- Mass caterers who serve standardised food, eg. fast food chains, must provide the following information on the package: name, ingredients, allergens, and country of origin of the food, as well as a nutrition declaration.
PROGRESS SO FAR
The aim of the draft legislation on labelling is to modernise, simplify and clarify food labelling in the European Union. In the run-up to next week's debate, the state of play in the co-decision process between the European Commission and the European Parliament is as follows:
- Mandatory nutrition information
Environment committee MEPs have agreed that key nutritional information, such as energy content, and amounts of fat, saturated fat, carbohydrates, sugar and salt, must be mandatory for all foodstuffs across the European Union. To this list they have added proteins, fibre and natural and artificial transfats, the inclusion of which, under the Commission proposal, would have been voluntary. All mandatory nutrition information should be given on the front of the pack. But since energy content is the most important item for consumers, MEPs have added specific rules to guarantee its visibility.
- Traffic lights
A plan for mandatory "traffic light" labels has been rejected.
- Clear labelling of "imitated food"
MEPs have strengthened the rules to ensure that consumers are not misled by the presentation of food packaging.
- Mandatory country of origin labelling
MEPs want the country of origin to be stated for meat, poultry, dairy products, fresh fruit and vegetables and other single-ingredient products as well as for meat, poultry and fish when used as an ingredient in processed food.
- Legibility
The environment committee recommended replacing the Commission's proposed requirement that all information be given in a minimum font size of 3mm with a stipulation that information be given in such a way as to ensure clear legibility. It asked the Commission to draw up guidelines to ensuring the legibility of consumer information on food.
- Alcoholic beverages
MEPs voted to exclude alcoholic beveragres from the mandatory nutritional declaration requirement.
- Nutrient profiles deleted
MEPs voted to delete the nutrient profiles, foreseen in the regulation on nutrition and health claims made on foods.
- Entry into force
To give the industry enough time to adapt to the new rules, the regulation would enter into force 20 days after its publication in the European Union Official Journal, but the rules on nutrition labelling would take effect from three years thereafter. For food business operators with fewer than 100 employees and an annual turnover and/or annual balance sheet total under £4m they would take effect five years thereafter.
Are Brits pessimistic or realistic?
Perhaps we Brits are just naturally more pessimistic than our friends on the continent, but there have been several occasions when we have considered their pig price forecasts to be optimistic.
Or perhaps we are just more realistic. We recognise that when paid servants of the industry see future prices through rosy-coloured spectacles they are doing it to protect their own salaries by persuading their own country's producers to stay in business.
But even when the best and most realistic brains are on the job, forecasting is an imprecise science because the unexpected will inevitably happen, be it foot-and-mouth or "swine flu".
Thus Danish producers are currently breathing a sigh of relief that their pig price is at last improving in line with forecasts.
In recent years the forecasts they have been given by their industry servants have turned out to be optimistic and this has put a strain on their budgeting and an even bigger strain on their relationship with their uneasy bankers.
Nobody is pretending the financial crisis in the Danish pig industry is over, but there are signs that there may be a future in pigs despite an unhelpful government, a hostile public, and marketeers adept at selling the Danish product at, in many cases, below the European average price.
friday june 11, 2010
Market stays firm despite weaker euro
Some fairly positive signals were sent out in the marketplace by the further improvement in the value of the DAPP which now stands at 146.16p, although the Tulip base price remained at a 148p stand-on.
United Kingdom pig numbers are reported to be on the tight side and as a result everything was sold despite one of the major players cutting their kill by 1,000 head for next week.
Although the weather has remained on the chilly side, there is a better forecast for the weekend and early next week which might help to stimulate demand on the barbecue front and although recent falls in the value of the euro are causing some concern, pig trading finished on a generally firm note with very few cases of spot bacon being traded for less than 150p/kg.
Several retailers are reporting to be living on something of a hand to mouth basis which may mean that if demand picks up new orders will come rolling in leading to further price rises in the weeks ahead. Traffic Lights commentary continued.
How to reduce record-keeping
A one-pager from the Food Standards Agency should help farmers keep only the necessary records on animal feed. "So it should also save farmers a significant amount of time and money," says the Agency.
This is the document:
Record keeping requirements.
Under European feed hygiene legislation, farmers must keep a number of records, including information on animal feed bought-in or sold.
The Agency identified the cost and time spent by farmers in complying with these requirements as an area where savings could be made, while maintaining traceability.
The guidance has been trialled with farmers in England who, after seeing it, told the Agency they were much clearer about what records they need to keep.
Not filling in unnecessary forms could save each farmer over 35 hours each year. In England it has been estimated that with the new guidance, farmers need only spend an hour each month on keeping records on feeds.
Greener to feed meat-and-bonemeal than to burn it
If meat-and-bonemeal, or "processed animal protein" as it is now called, is reintroduced to pig and poultry diets, it will reduce the European Union's dependency on imported proteins, particularly GM soya, according to a draft text currently circulating in Brussels.
The strategy paper paves the way for a possible change to current Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy safety rules, which ban the feeding of meat-and-bonemeal.
The paper has been drawn up by the European Commission's health and consumer department and is expected to be adopted next month.
Brussels is less nervous about TSE following an updated risk assessment by the European Food Safety Authority.
Basing its recommendations on evidence from the Authority, the report says the transmission of BSE from non-ruminants to non-ruminants is very unlikely and the current ban could be seen as a wasted opportunity.
It argues that it is more sustainable to use meat and bonemeal in feed than to use it to generate energy.
But there is no question of a relaxing of the ban on intra-species recycling ie. cannibalism.
So the question that still faces Brussels is how to guarantee pig meat-and-bonemeal does not accidentally find its way into pig diets.
Even when suitable safeguards are in place it is unclear how many retailers in Britain will accept pork from pigs fed on meat-and-bonemeal, notwithstanding its greener credentials.
Prices fall in the States
Pig prices have fallen for the first time in many weeks in the States. Wholesale pork has plunged 9.7 percent since touching a 21-month high in mid-May. The average cash price that slaughterhouses pay for immediate delivery of pigs has fallen 4 percent this month.
The strength of the dollar, up 18 percent this year versus the euro, may be curbing overseas demand for United States meat, according to Deutsche Bank.
"We believe the significant change in value between the euro and the US dollar has changed the competitive landscape and that Europe is taking export share from the United States."
Foot-and-mouth
1.5 percent and 0.7 percent of the Japanese pig and cattle herds have been slaughtered so far in the foot-and-mouth outbreak in Japan. Japan's new farms minister Masahiko Yamada has pledged to speed up efforts to deal with the disease. There are plans to slaughter an additional 122,000 animals.
Greenhouse gas target
European Union environment ministers will be in Luxembourg today to discuss climate change targets, water scarcity and GMs. They will consider an analysis by the European Commission on options to move beyond Europe's current 20 percent greenhouse gas reduction target.
Farm payment discrepancies
Around £26m is to be claimed back from Northern Ireland next month by the European Commission as a result of single farm payment discrepancies. A further £33m will be due by the end of the year. The Northern Ireland department of agriculture has lodged a request for concilation on both counts and Stormont politicians have appealed the fines before officials of the European Commission agriculture department.
Meat products regulation guidance
New guidance for meat products should make the process of correctly labelling any added ingredients easier, says the Food Srtandards Agency.
Under the Meat Products Regulations 2003, certain added ingredients must be mentioned in the name of any meat product that could otherwise be mistaken for plain meat, but has added ingredients such as water, starches or ingredients of animal origin.
New flow diagrams.
This particular regulation places a considerable burden on industry and was identified as an area where savings could be made, while maintaining clear and accurate information for consumers, says the agency.
The new guidance consists of easy-to-use flow diagrams, reducing the time it takes to decide how to label a product.
Stalls ban in Oz
Tasmania will ban pig stalls in 2014 — three years ahead of a national ban on stalls in Australia. The move has been welcomed by animal welfare groups, but has angered the state's pig farmers.
"I am very concerned that there has been no consultation with the local pig industry as to these earlier-than-expected changes," said opposition spokesman for primary industries Jeremy Rockliff.
The Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Association says the move will "destroy the Tasmanian pork industry's competitiveness".
Stalls will be illegal in Australia from 2017.
Castration workshop
European countries should work together to create a Brussels declaration on castration of piglets. This was the conclusion from a workshop on the subject, organised by the Brussels health and consumer department.
More than 100 participants discussed the results of research projects and studies, on current trends and consumers' attitudes and demands, as well as on alternatives to castration.
thursday june 10, 2010
Traffic Lights
Traffic Lights is up tuppence tonight. Wheat futures continue to fall, down around £3 over the past week.
 St Anne takes the chair
Pig industry friend Malton MP Anne McIntosh has been elected new chairman of the environment select committee. She will take over from Michael Jack.
"Anne McIntosh's time in Europe, as a shadow Defra minister and as a rural MP, means that she has a good understanding of the agriculture brief and the challenges that lie ahead," said
NFU president Peter Kendall today.
Will working with pigs boost their self-esteem?
Pig World's Oz columnist Neil Unger is asking for readers' help.
"I am looking at a scheme where mildly intellectually disabled kids can come to work at the piggery simply to boost their self esteem.
"Too often they have been abandoned and rejected as "retards". If anyone has done this already can you contact me please as I am at a loss to know just what the abilities or limitations are.
"I am not looking for cheap labour, just a way to help these kids to become useful in the community. The intention is there, the details are not.
"If you can help with any experience, good or bad, I desperately need that feed-back. They possibly have an affinity with animals that can be used."
Contact Neil at neil.unger@bigpond.com.
wednesday june 9, 2010
Golden era beckons
By Digby Scott
Pig production in England could enter a golden era as a result of the government’s determination to cut public spending.
Defra has been told by government to examine the effectiveness of every pound it spends. It may be ordered to cut its spending by as much as 25 percent.
Whilst the cutbacks will affect all areas of farming, they will be felt least by pig-keepers, who receive almost zero support from the public purse, and who have always relied on their own production and marketing skills to make a living.
But in recent years pig-keepers have been regulated to a forensic degree by Defra and its agencies, as well as by local authorities.
Defra can only make the cuts demanded of it by reviewing the level at which it enforces European regulation, and by adopting the sort of risk-based policies the pig sector has been urging for several years.
Pig-keepers can now help Defra identify areas where spending cuts can be made.
As most pig-keepers already pay to be independently inspected for regulatory compliance, there is scope for a significant reduction in the red-tape overload currently threatening the future viability of the industry.
Environment secretary Caroline Spelman will be appointing a minister with specific responsibility at Defra for cutting spending and getting better value for money.
The government wants all its departments, and local government, to come up with “fundamental changes” in the way they provide services.
It wants Defra to look at how it can promote fairness by more targeted interventions. The pig industry will argue that Red Tractor assurance could help achieve this.
Defra will be required to analyse all its spending, against the following questions:
- Is the activity essential to meet government priorities?
- Does the government need to fund this activity?
- Does the activity provide substantial economic value?
- Can the activity be targeted to those most in need?
- How can the activity be provided at lower cost?
- How can the activity be provided more effectively?
- Can the activity be provided by a non-state provider or by citizens, wholly or inpartnership?
- Can non-state providers be paid to carry out the activity according to the results they achieve?
- Can local bodies as opposed to central government provide the activity?
Defra has contributed 5.5 percent of its budget (£162m) to the government’s initial £6bn savings. The next comprehensive spending review, which will determine public spending for the next three years, will demand far greater cuts at the department.
The United Kingdom’s public sector net borrowing forecast is the largest in the nation’s peacetime history.
According to the International Monetary Fund, the United Kingdom has the highest budget deficit in the G7 and G20, and its latest forecasts project that public sector debt will double between 2007 and 2015, to around 90 percent of gross domestic product.
Government points out that public borrowing is only taxation deferred, and it would be irresponsible to accumulate substantial debts that would have to be paid off by subsequent generations in decades to come.
“Successfully reducing the largest deficit in Britain’s peacetime history will mean approaching the spending review in a completely different way from how it has been
approached in the past,” says Chancellor George Osborne.
“It will mean thinking innovatively about the role of government in society, taking the difficult decisions collectively as a government to reduce the deficit, and consulting widely using all available talents to ensure that we deliver a stronger society as well as a smaller state.”
Government’s emergency budget will be on June 22.
EARLY CANDIDATES FOR THE CHOP
Two expensive projects — they would have cost farmers £millions — are now leading contenders for government's cost-cutting axe.
- The controversial new headquarters for Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board at Stoneleigh.
- The proposed new cost-and-responsibility-sharing animal health quango.
If, as seems probable, plans for the new Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board headquarters at Stoneleigh are scrapped, the board will have to seek less expensive alternative premises near Stoneleigh.
|
